Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: New 3dMark 2003 high

  1. #1
    Lurking Moar Slaughter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    4,389

    New 3dMark 2003 high

    2461 is my new high..

    lets see about getting that up even higher..
    lol, <3

    Retired EQ, WoW Player.

  2. #2
    Lurking Moar Slaughter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    4,389
    ok, 3118 is the new high... darn my dx9 incompatible card..
    lol, <3

    Retired EQ, WoW Player.

  3. #3

    August Knights
    The old Man in the War [AK]Rocks's Avatar


    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Albany NY
    Posts
    1,837
    I'm sitting at 4635, with no Overclocking. What are you doing to rise your scores?

  4. #4
    Lurking Moar Slaughter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    4,389
    I have everything minutely tweaked.. all I did was reduce resolution.. lol
    lol, <3

    Retired EQ, WoW Player.

  5. #5
    Moderator

    August Knights
    Chief Recruiter

    [AK]Abaddon's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    2,496
    I have around 4950 as my high, with an overclock of my graphics card. Otherwise, it sits around 4700.
    [AK]Abaddon


  6. #6
    Moderator

    August Knights
    Chief Recruiter

    [AK]Abaddon's Avatar


    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    2,496
    Slaughter,

    What kind of card do you have? Supposedly the new Nvidia 43.45 drivers will make their GF3 and GF4 cards DX-9 compatible.
    [AK]Abaddon


  7. #7
    Lurking Moar Slaughter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    4,389
    Using GF4 Ti 4600 with the 43.45 drivers.. still both the dx9 tests are not supported to me..
    lol, <3

    Retired EQ, WoW Player.

  8. #8
    Who is Nuts and Abbadon? [AK]StitchJones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Ballston Spa NY
    Posts
    4,134
    I can't even get the program running anymore. it keeps dropping back the the desktop as soon as I start the testing. not sure what the hell is wrong now.
    Oh well. I know I'm buying a new card in the fall timeframe so I'm good for now.

  9. #9
    Administrator
    August Knights
    Chief Operations Officer


    "This place is like someone's memory of a town, and the memory is fading. "
    [AK]Squidly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Burlington, NJ
    Posts
    10,621
    There's definitely something weird going on with 2003. I got over 5200 the first time that I ran it, then I overclocked my vid card (very slightly) and the frames dropped so dramatically that I aborted after maybe two tests.

    I don't see any reason to stop using 2001 SE... It works well for almost everyone.
    The sun has fallen down
    And the billboards are all leering
    And the flags are all dead at the top of their poles.

Similar Threads

  1. 3DMark 2005 scores anyone?
    By [AK]Gunny Highway in forum Hardware & Performance Tuning
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-26-2004, 07:16 PM
  2. Favorite games of 2003
    By [AK]Faxman in forum August Knights Round Table
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-31-2003, 05:23 AM
  3. Quakecon 2003
    By [AK]StitchJones in forum August Knights Round Table
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-09-2003, 09:51 AM
  4. 3DMark 2003
    By [AK]Abaddon in forum Hardware & Performance Tuning
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 02-13-2003, 07:42 PM
  5. Ut 2003
    By Slaughter in forum August Knights Round Table
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 10-22-2002, 02:43 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •